Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. 178 (2013)
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Pre-arrest silence and invocation of the self-incrimination privilege. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Constitutional research / File 05
Amendment V
Explore grand juries, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, due process, and compensation for property taken for public use.
Explore the documentsBegin with the source
Amendment V
Ratified December 15, 1791
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Original spelling and punctuation preserved.
Read. Compare. Follow the source.
15 local PDFs for this amendment, with source details and a direct download for each. Start with an overview or follow a case.
15 documents in this file
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Pre-arrest silence and invocation of the self-incrimination privilege. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Public use and economic-development takings. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Two-stage interrogation and warnings given after an initial unwarned confession. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
The constitutional status of Miranda warnings. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
The framework for evaluating regulatory takings. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Procedural due process and the balancing approach to required hearings. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Compelled testimony and use-and-derivative-use immunity. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Issue preclusion within the Double Jeopardy Clause. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Application of the Double Jeopardy Clause to state prosecutions. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Custodial interrogation and safeguards for the privilege against self-incrimination. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
The distinction between compelled testimony and physical evidence. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Prosecutorial and judicial comment on an accused persons silence at trial. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Application of the privilege against self-incrimination to the states. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
Grand jury indictments based on hearsay evidence. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Supreme Court of the United States / Library of Congress
The same-elements test for identifying distinct offenses. Read as a historical decision alongside later authorities.
Try a shorter phrase or a different source type.