← Bill of Rights Research

Constitutional research / File 03

Amendment III

Soldiers & the home

Examine the rules on quartering soldiers in private homes during peace and war.

Explore the documents

Begin with the source

The original text.

Amendment III
Ratified December 15, 1791

National Archives transcription ↗
U.S. Constitution / Amendment III
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Original spelling and punctuation preserved.

Read. Compare. Follow the source.

The research file.

15 local PDFs for this amendment, with source details and a direct download for each. Start with an overview or follow a case.

Read each source in context. Court decisions and dated analyses are preserved as published. Later law may change their meaning. Sources marked as context explore related questions; they are not direct holdings on this amendment.

15 documents in this file

ScholarshipPDF / 2023 / 18 pages / 248 KB

Into the Weeds of the Third Amendment: Constitutional Protections for At-Home Marijuana Use

Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy

Presents a scholarly proposal about the modern reach of the quartering prohibition, not an established judicial rule.

ScholarshipPDF / 2022 / 28 pages / 268 KB

The Third Amendment in 2020

Stetson Law Review

Surveys Third Amendment litigation and scholarship during 2020, including modern claims about quartering.

ScholarshipPDF / 2019 / 27 pages / 291 KB

Penumbras Reconsidered: Interpreting the Bill of Rights through Intratextual Analysis with the Third Amendment

Oklahoma City University Law Review

Studies the relationship between the Third Amendment and other provisions of the Bill of Rights.

Contextual official analysisPDF / 2018 / 73 pages / 1.5 MB

The Posse Comitatus Act and Related Matters: The Use of the Military to Execute Civilian Law

Congressional Research Service

Context: explains statutory limits on domestic military law enforcement and their relationship to the constitutional civilian-military tradition.

ScholarshipPDF / 2015 / 16 pages / 249 KB

Are Houses of Worship Houses under the Third Amendment?

Tennessee Law Review; author copy hosted by Becket

Analyzes whether religious buildings fall within the amendment's protection against quartering.

Court decisionPDF / 2015 / 39 pages / 148 KB

Mitchell v. City of Henderson

U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada; original filing mirrored by Justia

Addresses a Third Amendment claim concerning police occupation of a home and whether municipal officers are soldiers.

ScholarshipPDF / 2015 / 18 pages / 240 KB

The Third Artefact: Beyond Fear of Standing Armies and Military Occupation, Does the Third Amendment Have Relevance in Modern American Law?

Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review, University of Alabama

Examines the Third Amendment's relationship to military power and modern civilian life.

ScholarshipPDF / 2014 / 7 pages / 174 KB

Privacy in the Digital Age

Indiana Law Review

Explores the Third Amendment as a proposed additional foundation for digital privacy; this is scholarly analysis.

ScholarshipPDF / 2014 / 27 pages / 256 KB

The Third Amendment: The Critical Protections of a Forgotten Amendment

Washburn Law Journal

Examines the protection against quartering, civilian control of the military, and modern applications.

Official analysisPDF / 2012 / 2 pages / 159 KB

Constitution Annotated: Third Amendment — Quartering Soldiers

Congressional Research Service / U.S. Government Publishing Office

Provides the official 2012 overview of the Third Amendment and references to Engblom v. Carey.

ScholarshipPDF / 2008 / 34 pages / 1.8 MB

Third Amendment Protections in Domestic Disasters

Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy

Examines how quartering protections might apply during domestic emergencies and disasters.

ScholarshipPDF / 1993 / 35 pages / 2.4 MB

The Third Amendment: Forgotten but Not Gone

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (original repository PDF mirrored by David J. Shestokas)

Examines the origins, interpretation, and continuing significance of the protection against quartering troops.

Contextual court decisionPDF / 1972 / 40 pages / 3.1 MB

Laird v. Tatum

Supreme Court of the United States / U.S. Reports

Context: considers military surveillance and standing, referring to constitutional resistance to military intrusion in civilian affairs.

Contextual court decisionPDF / 1967 / 28 pages / 1.9 MB

Katz v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States / U.S. Reports

Context: a Fourth Amendment privacy decision that mentions the Third Amendment; it does not decide a quartering claim.

Contextual court decisionPDF / 1965 / 53 pages / 8.8 MB

Griswold v. Connecticut

Supreme Court of the United States / U.S. Reports

Context: discusses the Third Amendment among privacy guarantees, rather than deciding a quartering claim.